In a recent interview on “WithChude,” Daniel Regha delved into his approach to sharing opinions on social media, particularly when it comes to calling out individuals such as Tems and Davido. Regha openly addressed the criticism that his opinions often contribute to toxicity online, defending his stance by asserting his right to express himself freely on his platform. 

When questioned about the perceived toxicity, Regha responded with conviction, stating that he airs his honest opinions not only for himself but also for the wider audience. He rejected the notion of waiting for validation or approval from others about the merit of his views. According to him, he exercises his autonomy over his social media page, utilizing it as a space to voice his thoughts without constraints. 

He defended his actions by highlighting the power of choice available to his followers and critics. In his view, his platform represents an arena where people can engage with his opinions or choose to disengage. He acknowledged that his audience has the option to block or report his content if they find it objectionable, which demonstrates the importance of individual agency and decision-making in navigating social media interactions. 

Ultimately, Regha's interview on “WithChude” sheds light on his unwavering commitment to authenticity and his conviction that his platform serves as an extension of his personal expression. While his candid opinions might attract controversy, he firmly believes that his right to self-expression remains a paramount principle in the digital landscape.